Coleen Rooney notoriously turned 'Wagatha Christie' six years ago, when she a sting operation after a string of stories shared on her private social media had been leaked to the media. , 39, narrowed down accounts with access to her posts in order to discover which account was leaking the information and exposed her fellow WAG as the culprit.
Rebekah, 43, furiously denied the allegation and attempted to sue Coleen, launching a libel case that took the WAGs all the way to the High Court. But with fans hooked to every minute of proceedings, the 2022 trial didn't go 's way when 's legal team managed to uncover messages between the WAG and her agent, Caroline Watt.
They retrieved the messages despite Caroline claiming she had dropped her phone into the North Sea on a family holiday. And they revealed that after a post from Coleen saying someone she trusted was leaking stories, the agent wrote to her client Rebekah: "It wasn't someone she trusted, it was me."
READ MORE:
This led the judge to state that it was "likely" Rebekah's agent had passed information to The Sun newspaper. "The evidence... clearly shows, in my view, that Mrs Vardy knew of and condoned this behaviour, actively engaging in it by directing Ms Watt to the private account, sending her screenshots of Mrs Rooney's posts, drawing attention to items of potential interest to the press, and answering additional queries raised by the press via Ms Watt," said Mrs Justice Steyn.
The wife of footballer Jamie Vardy was previously instructed to pay . Paul Lunt, partner and head of litigation at law firm Brabners, which represented Coleen, said: "The High Court has today decided that Rebekah Vardy must pay Coleen Rooney's legal costs on an indemnity basis - the highest basis that the court could order.
"The reasoning given for this decision is that there was a finding at trial that Rebekah Vardy had deliberately deleted or destroyed evidence. That behaviour falls outside the ordinary and reasonable conduct expected of a party in legal proceedings."
The WAG continues to challenge the costs claims and her lawyers asked the court to order Coleen's team to hand over "privileged" documents, and details about her claim for VAT, with Wayne Rooney's wife's lawyers saying this was a " expedition".
In October, the court heard Coleen's side had calculated her legal bill in the three-year-long libel battle as topping £1.8 million. Rebekah's lawyer, Jamie Carpenter KC, called this a "kitchen sink" approach, criticising costs for a lawyer staying "at the Nobu Hotel, incurring substantial dinner and drinks charges as well as mini bar charges" and saying there were more than £120,000 costs "of which Mrs Rooney has no entitlement". It is thought Rebekah had estimated her total bill would be around £500,000.
But Robin Dunne, acting for Coleen, argued it was "outrageous" to accuse them of being dishonest and slammed Rebekah's "deplorable conduct", adding that the legal costs would have been lower if "she conducted this litigation appropriately."
Senior costs judge Andrew Gordon-Saker ordered Mrs Vardy to pay a further £100,000 to Mrs Rooney within 21 days, with the full amount to be paid at a later date. He said: "I think there is some scope for a further payment on account so the defendant (Mrs Rooney) is not kept out of her costs, and I think that should be no more than £100,000."
Now, a hearing at The Royal Courts of Justice saw a written submission from Rebekah's barrister Juliet Wells explaining how Coleen's total legal bill of £1,833,906.89 "has now been settled at £1,190,000, being £1,125,000 plus interest of £65.000. " In an last year, Coleen branded the trial "horrible." She suggested she could not forgive Rebekah for her libel claim, but said "the relief was everything" to win.
You may also like
Prepaid recharge facility for electricity bill in UP, these are its benefits.
Aston Villa chief makes feelings crystal clear as Premier League grant special Tottenham request
Tom Cleverley was never going to survive Watford sack after deluded decision
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: SC issues notices to accused persons in SLPs challenging six acquittals
Mock Drill and Blackout: Why is the country preparing for war, what will happen during the Mock Drill?