BENGALURU: The one-man judicial commission constituted by Karnataka’s govt to probe the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru’s Chinnaswamy stadium that claimed 11 lives has held Royal Challengers Sports Pvt Ltd (RCSPL), which owns and runs RCB, event organisers DNA Entertainment , Karnataka State Cricket Association ( KSCA ) officials and senior police officers responsible for the tragedy.
The Justice D’Cunha Commission found that the organisers failed to obtain mandatory prior permissions — seven days before the event, as required under the Licensing and Controlling of Assemblies and Processions (Bengaluru City) Order, 2009.
Meanwhile in the high court, the state govt argued that police officers handling the situation on the day of the stampede had acted like “servants of RCB management”.
Poor security arrangement due to cops-organisers nexus
The Justice John Michael D’Cunha commission, which submitted its report recently, has recommended legal action against three from KSCA: Raghuram Bhat (president), A Shankar (former secretary), and ES Jairam (former treasurer); RCSPL vice-president Rajesh Menon; two from DNA: T Venkata Vardhan (MD) and Sunil Kumar (VP); three IPS officers: B Dayananda, Vikash Kumar Vikash, Shekhar T Tekkannavar; and two more from police department: C Balakrishna and AK Girish.
The commission found that the organisers failed to obtain mandatory prior permissions — seven days before the event, as required under Licensing and Controlling of Assemblies and Processions (Bengaluru City) Order, 2009.
Pointing out that police security arrangement was grossly inadequate and ineffective, the panel said senior cops were working on ‘bandobast’ under direct command of additional DGP and commissioner of police, “in nexus” with organisers, even before any formal security activation took place. “Out of 515 personnel deputed, only 79 were posted outside the gates to control the crowd. Even these officers were not visible at the venue during the crisis,” it noted.
Control room staff failed to alert on-ground security teams stationed at the entry gates. Despite clear signs of overcrowding, the exit gates were not opened in time, which the commission termed “a serious act of negligence and a breakdown of emergency protocols”.
The report also flagged improper and unscientific installation of barricades, combined with narrow and constricted entry gates, as a major contributing factor. Under-deployment of police at high-risk gates made the situation worse.
It concluded that the organisers themselves triggered the stampede by failing to regulate entry and by making reckless announcements about stadium access.
The situation, the commission said, was the result of “hasty decisions and lack of preparation, amounting to recklessness bordering on gross negligence”.
Standard protocols bypassed: Karnataka govt
The “who is responsible for the stadium stampede” debate took an interesting turn in Karnataka HC on Thursday with the state govt alleging that police officers handling the situation on the day of the tragedy had “acted like servants of RCB management”. However, a suspended IPS officer countered it saying that govt made him a scapegoat.
Vikash Kumar Vikash had challenged govt’s decision to suspend him in Central Administrative Tribunal (Bengaluru branch), which recently quashed his suspension and ordered his reinstatement. Referring to CAT’s move, govt told HC that CAT had exceeded its authority by conducting an unnecessary fact-finding mission whilst handling his petition.
Special advocate PS Rajagopal, representing govt, noted that police officers acted without proper requisition from RCB management as if they were servants of the entity. Regarding the tribunal’s decision to exonerate Vikash and advise the govt to extend the relief to four other officers, he said it had overstepped its jurisdictional boundaries.
He highlighted the unprecedented events of June 3 and June 4, where RCB hastily invited people without proper procedures. He pointed out that police arrangements were made despite lacking necessary permissions, bypassing standard protocols for venue inspection and safety assessments.
The Justice D’Cunha Commission found that the organisers failed to obtain mandatory prior permissions — seven days before the event, as required under the Licensing and Controlling of Assemblies and Processions (Bengaluru City) Order, 2009.
Meanwhile in the high court, the state govt argued that police officers handling the situation on the day of the stampede had acted like “servants of RCB management”.
Poor security arrangement due to cops-organisers nexus
The Justice John Michael D’Cunha commission, which submitted its report recently, has recommended legal action against three from KSCA: Raghuram Bhat (president), A Shankar (former secretary), and ES Jairam (former treasurer); RCSPL vice-president Rajesh Menon; two from DNA: T Venkata Vardhan (MD) and Sunil Kumar (VP); three IPS officers: B Dayananda, Vikash Kumar Vikash, Shekhar T Tekkannavar; and two more from police department: C Balakrishna and AK Girish.
The commission found that the organisers failed to obtain mandatory prior permissions — seven days before the event, as required under Licensing and Controlling of Assemblies and Processions (Bengaluru City) Order, 2009.
Pointing out that police security arrangement was grossly inadequate and ineffective, the panel said senior cops were working on ‘bandobast’ under direct command of additional DGP and commissioner of police, “in nexus” with organisers, even before any formal security activation took place. “Out of 515 personnel deputed, only 79 were posted outside the gates to control the crowd. Even these officers were not visible at the venue during the crisis,” it noted.
Control room staff failed to alert on-ground security teams stationed at the entry gates. Despite clear signs of overcrowding, the exit gates were not opened in time, which the commission termed “a serious act of negligence and a breakdown of emergency protocols”.
The report also flagged improper and unscientific installation of barricades, combined with narrow and constricted entry gates, as a major contributing factor. Under-deployment of police at high-risk gates made the situation worse.
It concluded that the organisers themselves triggered the stampede by failing to regulate entry and by making reckless announcements about stadium access.
The situation, the commission said, was the result of “hasty decisions and lack of preparation, amounting to recklessness bordering on gross negligence”.
Standard protocols bypassed: Karnataka govt
The “who is responsible for the stadium stampede” debate took an interesting turn in Karnataka HC on Thursday with the state govt alleging that police officers handling the situation on the day of the tragedy had “acted like servants of RCB management”. However, a suspended IPS officer countered it saying that govt made him a scapegoat.
Vikash Kumar Vikash had challenged govt’s decision to suspend him in Central Administrative Tribunal (Bengaluru branch), which recently quashed his suspension and ordered his reinstatement. Referring to CAT’s move, govt told HC that CAT had exceeded its authority by conducting an unnecessary fact-finding mission whilst handling his petition.
Special advocate PS Rajagopal, representing govt, noted that police officers acted without proper requisition from RCB management as if they were servants of the entity. Regarding the tribunal’s decision to exonerate Vikash and advise the govt to extend the relief to four other officers, he said it had overstepped its jurisdictional boundaries.
He highlighted the unprecedented events of June 3 and June 4, where RCB hastily invited people without proper procedures. He pointed out that police arrangements were made despite lacking necessary permissions, bypassing standard protocols for venue inspection and safety assessments.
You may also like
Calcutta HC acquits three on death row for 2014 murder
'Killed' by Meta, CM Siddaramaiah asks tech company to stop translations
Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis To Lay Foundation Of Vidarbha's First Integrated Steel Plant By LMEL In Gadchiroli On July 22
DWP PIP payment rates could rise by up to £26.80 per week from April 2026
Punish those preventing temple entry over caste: HC
